The disagreement between Trump and Musk is very distracting to me. I previously wrote an article to try to mediate, but I thought you two could resolve it yourselves, so I didn’t post it. However, you’ve recently been arguing again over the bill that recently passed. Let me share my thoughts for your reference. My article that explans about the interview of Christine Sundberg is a bit long, so it will be converted into a document for everyone to download when it’s done.
In this era of the world, there are many Reincarnations of Heavenly Beings. You have chosen this particula moment to serve, as a way to refine yourselves for ascension to higher levels of Heavens, and to get closer to the Source. I’ve mentioned before that Trump is a reincarnation of a Heavenly Being. Musk is also a reincarnation of a Heavenly Being. If the you two could work together, it would be a powerful force.
Musk is good at bringing prosperity and wealth to a place, that is his nature. It’s not hard to see that Musk is always chasing ideals. He throws himself into those ideals without hesitation. His intention to serve humanity is strong. However, this comes with prerequisites: The real world conditions must be taken into account and handled carefully.
The US is not Argentina. I know you want to emulate Argentina’s reforms. But Argentina’s currency is not an international reserve currency, nor does it have a massive and complex interest structures. I bear some responsibility for this, because I urged you to pursue reform. But if the reform puts you in danger, then we must change the approach.
We’re not just facing physical opponents (humans), but also the powerful force of cause-and-effect (karma). There has been too much killing on Earth, and the souls seeking revenge will assist the so-called physical opponents (humans). Without assistance from Heaven, intervening in cause-and-effect (karma) means bearing the retaliation of the opponent. This is very dangerous for you.
For example, if someo people gamble in a casino, where the rules of the game are set by the casino. When they lose a huge amount of money and cannot pay, the casino holds them. To rescue them, we must pay their debt. If we try to take them by force, we will be hunted by the casino’s people. This is a similar kind of situation. So when negotiating with the casino to save some people, we have to be very cautious. Sometimes compromises or deals are necessary.
The Big Beautiful Bill
The core of your conflict mainly lies in this bill. The bill’s tax cuts and increased spending are common budgetary measures, but the controversy lies in the specific items of those cuts and expenditures. To understand the details, one would need to examine the bill closely. The main points of contention appear to be the cuts to healthcare-related social welfare, tax breaks for corporations, and an increase in military spending.
Trump’s reasoning is to revitalize manufacturing and make America great again. From Trump’s perspective, governing is very challenging. Given the situation with China, Russia, and the Middle East, US military cannot afford to be weak. Tax breaks for businesses help the wealthy. Trump believes this will encourage businesses to invest in America, build factories, and create jobs. However, whether this actually happens depends on whether the wealthy actually reuse their profits into development. These are what Trump needs to be cautious.
You both want to solve the problem of America. However, this bill makes Musk feel betrayed and sold out. American businesses don’t just want tax cuts; they are also deeply concerned about the US debt crisis. This is because the assets held by these companies are in US dollars. If the US dollar’s credibility collapses, businesses will go bankrupt too. This is part of why Musk is working so hard to save America—for his own sake as well. There’s nothing wrong with this motive, as it benefits others at the same time.
The Solution
The reason I previously advised Trump not to engage in a tariff war is that reconciling and cooperating with other countries could also address these issues. There is no need to force so much manufacturing and capital back to the US. At the same time, collaborating with Musk to cut spending could help. By both increasing revenue and cutting costs, the problem can be resolved more smoothly. The issue is that many vested interests within the US government have conflicting opinions and constantly try to influence Trump’s decisions. This is a test of how you both make choices. This is a situation that truly tests your ability to make wise choices.
As for Musk’s idea of forming a third political party, I personally don’t think it is the right time. In the short term, a third party would become a target for criticism from all sides. In the long term, it might not even be necessary to form one, as the future will be vastly different from the present.
This isn’t entirely about who’s at fault. If you two don’t cooperate and instead clash head-on, you both sides will lose. This benefits no one. I hope you’ll deeply reflect on the situation you’re in and make wiser decisions. Let me remind you of one more thing: The dark forces do not want you to work together. You must think carefully before acting.
